Infringement

There are efforts in play to neutralize the Constitution. Similar to the liberal scheme (NPV) to go around the Electoral College, gun phobia persists in many last minute camouflaged legislative tactics. Some states have joined an unconstitutional compact to pry away electors from their elected authority. Repetitive and comparable circumventions of the constitution override the 2nd amendment provision that simply tolerates no infringement.  The least common denominator is constitutional contempt.  

“No Compacts”

The lawyers organize a compact to override the established law of elections.

“Shall not be infringed”. 

 The lawyers introduce incrementally innocuous adjustments to the right to bear arms which  purposefully infringes.

 They cannot change the Constitution through the prescribed amendment protocol because there is no support for the changes. No 3/4 majority of the states can be garnered. The Amendments became the Bill of Rights by adoption and approval of the states.  The detour to alternative methods for changing the Constitution have evolved from not being able to acquire the majority needed. But alternative detours are prohibited by the Constitution.  

The intentional design and inclusion of the phrases  “no compacts” and “no infringement “ meant that the strength of the law was reinforced in its original form.  Reinforced in its original form.  The founders thought that writing the law wasn’t strong enough so they added rebar to prevent the concrete from breaking apart.

Despite the founder’s cautions, these layered slivers of deliberate delinquency threaten the Amendments by infringement. These threats are like Mohs surgeries on the skin of the law.  Peel away the Constitution one slice at a time . 

 The noise of media turbulence is regenerated when psycho-shootings happen and are then exploited to justify the “never waste  a good crisis” mantra that Rom Emmanuel prophesied on his way to mayorhood of Chicago.  It’s not  so much ignoring the Constitution as it is shredding it. We the people should honor the original intent of the law for the very same reasons they were written in the first place and resist the prohibited urge to fix what ain’t broken.